On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:19:23 +0000, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:00:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:10:59PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>>
>> > and I've been following them carefully, and none of them have
>> > said anything appreciably more meaningful than "I want to keep
>> > non-free" or "I want to drop non-free".
>>
>> I think there's room for something along the lines of "I want to
>> spin non-free off as a separate project". Much of the concern over
>> dropping non-free seems to be about having things just suddenly
>> vanish.
> We can't meaningfully pass a GR that determines what some non-Debian
> project does - so I can't think how that would be any different.
How is it any less meaningful than passing a GR that woulkd be
in contravention of the social contract? And not so long ago you were
a proponent of just such an action.
manoj
--
We all live in a state of ambitious poverty. Decimus Junius Juvenalis
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
