On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:53:09PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > The point is that perhaps the majority of project members no longer > wish to include or support non-free.
If that's the case, then your refusal to talk about this as a part of changing the social contract is very hard to understand. [As you indicated, items 5 and 1 are both relevant here.] In essence: "no longer wish to ... support non-free" makes this a supermajority issue. There's no value at all in pretending other wise. -- Raul
