* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021120 11:36]: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:54:30PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > [1] The simplest: discard supermajority entirely. Nothing special is > > required to override "important decisions". This has some elegantly > > simple mathematical properties but I don't know of any other argument > > for it. > I support this. I'd rather see whether or not we screw up in the > absence of supermajority requirements instead of just assuming that we > will.
<AOL /> -- Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KC0OBS http://www.ringworld.org/ "Many voters assume that their political leaders are hard at work on these issues. They are not." _Editorial: Time to choose / Who will deliver on transportation?_ http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/3367890.html
pgpn5DE9RPmHx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
