Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Joey> So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the > Joey> text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph. > > I think that is what should be done in any case, if this GR > passes. We leave the DFSG around (since other people and projects > have defined themselves around the DFSG, and they may not wish to > change). (historical reasons also present themselves). > > If the GR passes, the project can choose to adopt DFSG-2 (-3, > -4, ...) as we wish.
Makes sense to me. Except, I think I mispoke and the GR doesn't actually touch the DFSG at all, just other parts of the Social Contract. -- see shy jo
