On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 04:06:41PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:32:03PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > The requisite discussion period having been entertained, I therefore > > formally call for a vote on this topic, on the Resolution which I > > originally posted on June 7, 2000, a copy of which is included below. > your CFV is unconstitutional because nothing in the consitution allows > the Social Contract or DFSG to be amended.
Has the project secretary ruled on this yet? If not, it doesn't seem reasonable to state this as fact. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and working code.'' -- Dave Clark
pgpcX581pKXRy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
