[please CC: any replies to me] > Perhaps the GR proposed is not the most adiquate solution to do this, but > I think if there were a second alternative on the table which did not > alter the social contract and was less technically damaging to the project > that it actually would have a fair chance at passing.
Moving the non-free archive parts further away from the main parts (new directory hierarchy? new server/CNAME?), and making the package acquisition tools verbosely advise the user about the non-freeness of the software he tries to get/install. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
