On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 03:33:17PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > You're jumping through a lot of hoops to get to somewhere which is a bit > like multiarch, but not quite. And you'll end up with something less > capable, more ugly and a lot more work to support properly when > upgrading to multiarch. Doing the full dance is less work.
You don't know that. Multiarch isn't designed yet. [That's why some of my questions about "what's what" get answers like "read these email discussions".] > You're claiming, for some reason, that amd64 needs to prepare for > multiarch migration in some other way than our 11 other architectures > because you think that the amd64 porters should support solving problems > for sarge a way none of the porters are willing to solve for sarge. There's no need to get so excited about this. I never claimed that those porters had to do that work. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
