>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> This last one could be considered on-topic for -vote in
Michael> the context of this unholy GR, but I rather think it's
Michael> abuse of it, as we have a release team for this kind of
Michael> issue.
It is not abuse of the process for the project as a whole to decide
that it disagrees with a decision that some part of the project has
made. It should be done rarely; it should be done in a way that
minimizes feelings that people's work is not appreciated.
However I think it is dangerous to say that the project should not or
especially cannot chose as a whole to disagree with part of itself.
I even think this issue might be important enough that voting on it is
reasonable. However if it came to a vote today I'd almost certainly
vote to support the release team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
