When you accused me of interpreting official documents "pedanticaly", I wondered what you meant exactly with being pedantic.
Thanks for the illustrative example! On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:05:54PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > >1. that the next Debian GNU/Linux release, codenamed "sarge", will=20 > > include the "amd64" architecture, based on the work currently hosted=20 > > at http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ ; > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > under? > > >2. that non-compliance of that "amd64" distribution with the Linux=20 > > Standard Base specification for IA32 will not be considered a=20 > > release-critical bug; > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > under? > > >3. that we will include it immediately in the "sid" distribution and=20 > > auto-building infrastructure, and take all appropriate steps so=20 > > that inclusion won't delay the release of "sarge" any further. > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > under? > > I'm unconvinced that you have the constitutional powers to make > decisions like this via a GR. > -- > Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
