Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I see. Is that what the Constitution says? If you don't like who > > won, then just keep proposing GRs, claiming that not enough people > > voted last time? When you lose a vote, raise as big a stink as > > possible and have more votes? You really think this is a good > > procedure? > > FWIW, they _are_ two different GRs. You can view them as (1) "let's > remove the possible ambiguity in the SC", (2) "now it's crystal clear > that significant changes are required, let's decide when/how we'll > implement them". Only one of the six options in the new GR is actually > asking to revert the old one.
I surely agree. My complaint is with Hamish's blithe assertion that voting things down in Debian causes people to stop lobbying the relevant issues. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
