* Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040625 13:25]: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:11:47PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > > > The current vote will determine what the majority of voters think. > > > > > Hopefully that will be the end of it. > > > > > > > > Not likely. The last vote determined what 3/4 of the voters thought, > > > > and people weren't willing to let that be the end of it. > > > > > > Uh, no, how many times and how many people will have to say that the title > > > and description were suboptimal (to put it mildly) before you are convinced > > > that the ballot didn't actually match what many voters thought? > > > > I don't recall you complaining at the time about the title or > > description.
> Perhaps because nobody ever hinted that the resolution would cause the > release manager to change things? Heck, I didn't see any hints that the > resolution _could_ cause any such thing. > > (I'm not subscribed to -vote so if it was mentioned there I missed it, > but then, at least half the voting body isn't subscribed to it, either, > nor should it have to be.) Anthony himself told that very plain on -vote, but in a mail in the non-free-removal thread that was killfiled at that time by most people reading -vote. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
