Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That was because the voters were 20% of the developers, as you well > know. I'm also hoping that we've engaged enough of the developers that > we might get a representative vote this time.
I see. Is that what the Constitution says? If you don't like who won, then just keep proposing GRs, claiming that not enough people voted last time? When you lose a vote, raise as big a stink as possible and have more votes? You really think this is a good procedure? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
