On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > However, as the 3:1-majority is needed anyways(*), I don't mind to add > something like: > In the opinion of the Secretary, this proposal overrules the social > contract, and needs therefor a 3:1-majority. In the opinion of the > proponent, it doesn't overrules the social contract, but just put more > siginficance on the interests of our users (as in SC #4).
When there's a dispute about the constitution (and the 3:1 majority issue is a constitutional thing), the secretary chooses the right interpretation. (http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution, search for "interpret") -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
