* Manoj Srivastava: >> For our users, we promise to do regular releases; as a guideline, a >> major release of the distribution should happen about once a year. > > On what basis do you think we can make this promise?
On the same basis that we promise not to hide bugs? Or not to rely on non-free software? > That policy violates the SC. You essentially told a delegate > to go violate the social contract, and I don't think we can do that. Ahem, this proposal tries to assure a delegate that his scruples are unwarranted and that he should go on as previously planned. After reading Anthony's comment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I think this is a non-issue anyway. > As it stands, I do not think that this proposal meets the > requirements for helping determine the changes in release schedule > of sarge in voew of GR 2004_003; therefore I think it may need to go > on a separate ballot (since it is there fore a separate issue). I > need to think about it more before making an official ruling on > this, and I am open to being persuaded either way. As a whole, I think it's in line. IMHO, it's not more off target than proposal E, for example. -- Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the following domains: bigpond.com, di-ve.com, fuorissimo.com, hotmail.com, jumpy.it, libero.it, netscape.net, postino.it, simplesnet.pt, spymac.com, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr, yahoo.com. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
