On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 07:38:11PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --------------------- > > > > > > We, Debian developers, issue the statement: > > > > > > "On the question on what software should be allowed in the main section > > > of our archive (The official Debian distribution) for our forthcoming > > > release code-named Sarge, we resolve that we will apply the same criterion > > > as for our preceding release, code-named Woody." > > > > > > --------------------- > > > > Was the GFDL used in woody at all? > > Regardless, I think the statement should use more definite language than > "the same criterion as for our preceding release." Does anyone have any > good ideas?
How about: We, Debian developers, issue the statement: "On the question on what software should be allowed in the main section of our archive (The official Debian distribution) for our forthcoming release code-named Sarge, we resolve that all programs must meet the DFSG, and all software must be legally distributable." -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
