Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To the question whether the SC allows for Sarge to be released more > or less as it is currently, Anthony has clearly stated he delegates > the decision to the technical commity, which has replied that the > developers could settle the issue by a GR.
Did the Technicall Committee really say officially that they refuse to decide, or did only individual member say that they prefer a GR? > --------------------- > > We, Debian developers, issue the statement: > > "On the question on what software should be allowed in the main section > of our archive (The official Debian distribution) for our forthcoming > release code-named Sarge, we resolve that we will apply the same criterion > as for our preceding release, code-named Woody." > > --------------------- Was the GFDL used in woody at all? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
