On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:36:52PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > See, there you go again. It's not part of the Debian distribution; > > but it's certainly part of the Debian project. Saying categorically and > > without clarification that non-free isn't part of "Debian" is exactly > > as bad as saying it is part of "Debian". > But the Social Contract says it's not part of Debian. Right there, in > those words.
Yes, and then it clarifies precisely what it means when it says "Debian" -- "the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution". Right there. In those words. If you were to do likewise every time you make the claim that non-free isn't part of Debian, I wouldn't be objecting to your calls for clarity on others' behalfs. As it is, you're just contributing to the confusion, and a hypocrite to boot. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
