Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And i expect in future you to give back the same courtesy, and to > distinguish from context the different meaning that are put in the word > debian, be it the debian distribution, the debian project, the debian > infrastructure, ..., instead of insisting that we are confusing all of > them.
I'm not giving "compromise" two different meanings. There are simply two kinds of compromises that could be struck. The old one, which has broken down in my opinion, and perhaps a new one. On the other hand, when saying that Debian has no non-free packages, I'm simply repeating what I understand from the current text of the SC, where it says that such packages are "not a part of Debian". Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
