* Anthony Towns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040305 16:40]: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:32:45PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-05 15:25]: > > > > I disagree with this. I think that maintainers who neglect their > > > > duties and don't follow documented procedures (orphan their > > > > packages, inform the keyring maintainer that they are leaving the > > > > project [1]) should not be treated the same as maintainers who > > > > leave the project properly. > > > Then how should they be treated, exactly? > > They should be treated like people who don't follow their duties, > > which is what they did. In practice, this means that someone who left > > Debian properly by resigning can easily come back by mailing the > > keyring maintainer. Those who did not retire properly, on the other > > hand, will have to go through New Maintainer in order to ensure they > > understand their duties and procedures in Debian.
> So, for example, I should be put through n-m again immediately because I > haven't been doing regular maintenance of cruft or ifupdown? I consider this a good idea, yes. Thanks for that proposal. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
