On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:49:23AM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 21:21]: > > People who have simply become inactive should be treated as much > > like those who have resigned as possible. We should thank them for > > their efforts, put them on the emeritus keyring, and find new > > maintainers for their packages. > I disagree with this. I think that maintainers who neglect their > duties and don't follow documented procedures (orphan their packages, > inform the keyring maintainer that they are leaving the project [1]) > should not be treated the same as maintainers who leave the project > properly.
Then how should they be treated, exactly? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
