On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:22:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:17:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:46:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Let's not be hypocrit, and continue distributing non-free, but put a > > > much bigger pressure to either free the code or replace it by free > > > alternatives, and you will hurt the upstream much more than by removing > > > non-free, after all, you will encourage their competence, and make them > > > loose market share. > > > > You can do that already, *now*. No need to change the Social Contract > > for that. > > Sure, and i already *did* in the past. > > And it is the remove non-free proponents which want to modify the social > contract, remove non-free, and stop us from being able to do the above.
One point why I am a 'remove non-free proponent' is because I feel that the 'keep non-free proponents' failed to actually cut down on non-free's size in the past. And the repeated proposals by Raul sure give me the impression that the 'keep non-free proponents' want to change the Social Contract. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
