On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:17:55PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:46:55PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Let's not be hypocrit, and continue distributing non-free, but put a > > much bigger pressure to either free the code or replace it by free > > alternatives, and you will hurt the upstream much more than by removing > > non-free, after all, you will encourage their competence, and make them > > loose market share. > > You can do that already, *now*. No need to change the Social Contract > for that.
Sure, and i already *did* in the past. And it is the remove non-free proponents which want to modify the social contract, remove non-free, and stop us from being able to do the above. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
