On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:28:13AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > We only accepted the LSB on the proviso that it would not interfere > > with other packages - that it could be handled entirely by the people > > who were interested in supporting LSB applications. I object to any > > proposal to expand it beyond this. > > You seem to be asserting that we, as a project, shouldn't recognize such > standards violations as bugs.
Correct. Violating the LSB is not a bug. Nor is violating the win32 API. Neither of them are relevant; we ship Debian packages, not LSB packages or win32 programs, even though Debian happens to be able to run all three under certain conditions. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
