On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:38:13PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > If I understand you correctly [and there's a very good chance that I do > not understand you correctly], you are advocating ideas from a proposal > you don't wish to advocate? > > Or maybe you are in the process of proposing something else, but that's > not ready yet, so instead we're talking about this other proposal? > > Or maybe ... > > I really do not understand what it is you're trying to do, nor why.
I'm just trying to say why, in my opinion, non-free should go. Many of the same reasons motivated the 2000 proposal. The reasons also apply to the proposals now before us, in my opinion; the authors of those proposals obviously may disagree and must speak for themselves. I am not presently drafting any new proposal, nor do I have any plans to propose anything. I just thought it would be handy when you asked me to write up something about my reasons, to just point you to something I already wrote, thinking it may be relevant to today's discussion :-) -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
