> > http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/skepticism/blfaq_fall_abusive.htm
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:26:48AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > This page is wrong. You're not offering any evidence for any of your assertions, are you? Here's another page: http://www.goodart.org/attack.htm Seems to be in alignment with that other page. The references, by the way, are spelled out at the bottom of http://www.goodart.org/fallazoo.htm However, to be fair, I can find pages which agree with your position. Unfortunately, they seem to also be pure assertion, with no reasoning to back up those assertions. For example: http://www.whiterose.org/cluey/archives/003329.html I don't find such assertions to be very convincing. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
