On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:21:05PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:51:24AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > While "Don't respond to Craig Sanders" is usually a good idea, I feel > > compelled to point out to anybody casually watching that the parent > > post is pure FUD; read it with a critical mind and you should find the > > flaws. The first paragraph, for example, is entirely delusional. > > This is ad hominem.
At no point did I suggest that he was wrong because of who he is. I suggested that talking to him is a bad idea because of who he is. That's not an ad hominem argument - it's not even an argument. It's a perfectly normal insult. I further noted that he was wrong, and felt no need to offer a detailed rebuttal, since any intelligent reader should be able to think it through for themselves, given a hint. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
