On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:22:50AM -0500, I wrote: > [1] I don't see that there's any reason at all to agree that voting > "further discussion" on irrelevant amendments is an insincere choice. > > [2] I agree with Manoj, that if the secretary deems the ammendment to > be orthogonal to the vote that the secretary has the power to put it on > a separate ballot.
[3] The trivial "defense" against this "tactic" is to propose a new amendment that combines both the original option and this new option. This addresses the cases where the amendment is relevant and perhaps, in some people's eyes, a better idea than the original proposal. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
