On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:50:59PM +1100, Clinton Mead wrote:
> Assuming that the default option is the status quo, that is, the 
> currently selected option.
> And assuming that an option winning an election makes it the status quo, 
> and hence the default option.
> And assuming the default option should never be determental to the 
> chances of an option winning.

These aren't valid assumptions. The default option is *not* the status-quo
(it's "further discussion", not "preserve non-free", or "none of the
above", not "another term for Bdale"); and winning does not make an
option the default for future votes.

If you wish to talk about the status-quo, you need to talk about it
independently of the default option.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: msg02314/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to