Le Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 12:34:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns �crivait: > Obviously Debian's the sort of project where there're going to be a > bunch of people who won't accept that, for whatever reasons, but it > strikes me as a bad idea to go around officially ratifying everything > that's common sense to most people.
Great, I'm glad to hear that what I said is only common sense. Now if you can convince the operator in question to respect that common sense, i may have no problem stopping here with the GR. My problem is that the operator in question said that he would continue doing like he did until we decide on a new policy. I acknowledge the fact that he stopped kicking people since the the issue came out, but I wonder what he will do if I withdraw my general resolution. I'd accept to stop my general resolution if Branden said publicly here something like : � I won't ever kick anyone from #debian-devel unless the concerned person is voluntarily trying to harm #debian-devel � (here: to harm means "dropping the S/N ratio") It's up to Branden to decide now. > For example, if we've specifically ratified #debian-private on > openprojects for discussion of issues from -private, what does that say It's not the subject of my general resolution. Please read again my first clarification message. > Legislating where you can and can't talk about Debian issues is > bureaucracy gone mad. I agree ... Cheers, -- Rapha�l Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/ Le bouche � oreille du Net : http://www.beetell.com Naviguer sans se fatiguer � chercher : http://www.deenoo.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
