On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 08:24:25AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > How about an alternative approach? A simple reply pointing out > a few points of the constituition which are directly relevant, > asking for reconsideration would be best. Be friendly and > point out where you think the secretary has gone wrong. > > No grandstanding, though, thanks. This is a volunteer > organisation, after all. <aol> I agree. </aol> Thanks, -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Josip Rodin
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Joseph Carter
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Seth Arnold
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Branden Robinson
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Robert Woodcock
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Hamish Moffatt
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul D. Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Buddha Buck
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Anthony Towns
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Seth Arnold