On 31-Oct-00, 10:59 (CST), Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 05:56:24AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > > > There isn't any particular urgency for him to act at the moment > > Yes, I suppose it's not important what the outcome of the last vote was. I am hoping strongly that that vote is annulled without ever announcing the result in favor a new ballot and new vote. Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Josip Rodin
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Joseph Carter
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Seth Arnold
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Branden Robinson
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Steve Greenland
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Robert Woodcock
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Hamish Moffatt
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul D. Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Buddha Buck
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Anthony Towns
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller