-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:24:49PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > >So if TB is supposedly better than Lookout, how does it differ? So > >far, TB sounds identical to Outlook.
> Uhm, let's see. Open Source, Bayesian filtering built in, decent > plugin support, awesome IMAP support, doesn't compose HTML mail by > default, I've never seen TB try to define a charset in the > Subject, adheres to far more standards. Oh, and is a few years > younger than Lookout! OK, then why does TB still have more in common than OE than a real mail client? - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJQVfUzgNqloQMwcRAggnAKC88UHKazIeAPQJ/v7NE+jGclZsjQCfTQNX /4HQzq2J+cogofVMnAgRCas= =4c5S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
