Hi,

firstly, thanks to all who cared to answer. Even if i don't quote and
reply to all of them.


Brad Rogers wrote:
> Based on what Thomas wrote in reply (here) to my post, I'm guessing he
> isn't knowingly altering the user agent string.

I am completly 20th century when it comes to web browsers.
The only adaption i made to modern times is to memorize the name by
which i start them:
"mosaic", "mozilla", "firefox", "iceweasel", "firefoz-esr", ...


[email protected] wrote:
> why is the about page not c&pasteable?

What "about" page in particular ?
about:config is gigantic, about:about shows no promising about-names.

I had to bother
  firefox-esr --help
to find a way to show its version:

  $ firefox-esr --full-version
  Mozilla Firefox 115.11.0esr 20240506144012 20240506144012 

(I already had found "115.11.0" in about:config with search word
"version". But there are other version numbers, too, and none said
Firefox Version or alike.)


Mike Kupfer wrote:
> No problems accessing that page or the debian-68k page.  Debian 12.13,
> firefox-esr 140.9.0esr-1~deb12u1.

So what would possibly go wrong if i do:

  apt-get update
  apt-get install firefox-esr

?
Are any dependcy problems to expect ?

What does
  https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox-esr
under "versions" mean with "old-sec" and "old-p-u" ?


Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Does that ACTUALLY work?  I have an incredibly hard time believing
> they're blocking with a 403 based on user agent, especially a user
> agent that's actually in Debian.

Max Nikulin wrote:
> May be similar to (specific to your public IP)
> debian-wiki. forbidden access to wiki. Sun, 11 Jan 2026 00:49:31 +0100
> <https://lists.debian.org/debian-wiki/2026/01/msg00004.html>

The Wanderer wrote:
> For people who are experiencing the 403 result, it might be interesting
> to see whether another client (e.g., w3m, or - perhaps even more
> usefully, because it can be made to produce verbose output about what
> it's doing - wget) gets the same result, or receives the page just fine.

  $ wget https://lists.debian.org/debian-wiki/2026/01/msg00004.html
  --2026-03-27 17:09:59--  
https://lists.debian.org/debian-wiki/2026/01/msg00004.html
  Resolving lists.debian.org (lists.debian.org)... 
2001:41b8:202:deb:216:36ff:fe40:4002, 82.195.75.100
  Connecting to lists.debian.org 
(lists.debian.org)|2001:41b8:202:deb:216:36ff:fe40:4002|:443... connected.
  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
  Length: 4559 (4.5K) [text/html]
  Saving to: ‘msg00004.html’

  msg00004.html       100%[===================>]   4.45K  --.-KB/s    in 0s     
 
  2026-03-27 17:09:59 (40.0 MB/s) - ‘msg00004.html’ saved [4559/4559]

I get a HTML page where arnault perret complains about
"forbidden access to wiki" and shows his static IPv4 and IPv6.
So yes, it seems to be a web client thing and not about my dynamic IP
addresses (from Telekom Deutschland GmbH).

lynx is installed, w3m is not.
lynx displays https://lists.debian.org/debian-wiki/2026/01/msg00004.html
But navigation in
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k
is cumbersome without pointer device. 
After some forth and back with the user interface i came to the thread
to which i wanted point yesterday. Now it would be helpful if lynx
would display the URL where it is currently ...


Brad Rogers wrote:
> You'll need to install a User Agent Switcher plugin (several available
> from the Ff add-ons store) and set it up (for lists.debian.org) to use;
> Mozilla/5.0 (%OS_SLICE% rv:145.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/145.0

A store ? In firefox ?
Do you mean "about:addons" ?
This brings me to
  https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search/?q=User%20Agent%20Switcher%20
which intimidates me somewhat. {:)

> To set up a new profile type about:profiles into the url bar, and one of
> the options you'll see is "Create New Profile".

There i see two profiles "default-esr", which is "in use", and
"default". And there is a field "Create a New Profile".


Andy Smith wrote:
> I think it should be reported as a bug on debian-www

Brad Rogers wrote:
> Already being discussed there.  Have subbed and will see how things go.

And i, as a victim, am excluded from digging around. Not Fair ! ;-)


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I will ponder whether i should mess with the currently working browser.

I will try w3m whether it is more attractive than lynx for the purpose
of browsing the list archives.

Which of the more graphical browsers (e.g. from
https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers) would be the one with the least
dependency backpack for an fvwm environment which was installed on
a Debian which originally had XFCE ?


Have a nice day :)

Thomas

Reply via email to