Hi, i realize that i posted the content of the wrong SHA512SUMS file. The one i posted was from debian 12.7.0. Nevertheless the SHA512 sums which i posted earlier are of the files from 12.10.0 which i downloaded yesterday.
Pier Antonio Corradini wrote: > The content of these links, seen now, is the following: > cb089def0684fd93c9c2fbe45fd16ecc809c949a6fd0c91ee199faefe7d4b82b64658a264a13109d59f1a40ac3080be2f7bd3d8bf3e9cdf509add6d72576a79b > debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso > 71d4c4e2ea7b617362875a74eb007308ae577ebe4b02ffeb626f1d12eaf412567d1d1816dbdbbb84cfaa38a205c13abf317ec227e5b2df9c982979698909889c > debian-edu-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso > 269e64d2a379429905cf95191036cc53fdc148c624af68386d3a238f5fe2c5b03e3732706eaac175303b1fe327f691dc50faf8d65665781d6bcbbabf072559fa > debian-mac-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso These checksums match what i see in my downloaded SHA512SUMS file of debian-12.10.0 netinst. (Not the one from 12.7.0.) So if the check run from your initial mail indicates a matching SHA512 checksum of the .iso file in the SHA512SUMS file and if you believe my word, then your ISO image is good. The trust in my word could be replaced by unaltered files SHA512SUM and SHA512SUM.sign and a successful gpg --verify run. But i cannot give advice how to achieve this in a MS-Windows environment. Have a nice day :) Thomas
