On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 07:55:33AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: [...]
> I normally use "sudo -s", which is the closest sudo approximation to > the traditional behvior of "su" (before it was broken in buster). > > "sudo -i" is meant to approximate the behavior of "su -". Before buster, > nobody would have used that on a Debian system. It's horrible. The > fact that people are now embracing it as a norm is even worse. I hear you (well, I read you) and keep your notes in high esteem. However, I found myself more often doing "su -" back then (TM), so I gravitated quite naturally towards "sudo -i". Differently wired brain? Different contexts? Plain incompetence? (Mine: in things shell, I'm the incompetent among both of us :-) Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
