Isn't this the usual DKIM problem with lists? The From: has @loop.de, but the sender and DKIM signature is from lists.debian.org.
That's why most lists these days rewrite the From: header. Detlef On 7/4/24 14:24, Hans wrote:
Me again, sorry. Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag! Subject: Re: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail! This is the header: -------------------- X-Spam-Flag: YES X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM X-Envelope-From: bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop...@lists.debian.org DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu 464C5Iek122979 Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loop.de Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=megamailservers.eu header.i=@megamailservers.eu header.b="QLjumGn/" Return-Path: <bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop...@lists.debian.org> Received: from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by mail39c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 464C5Iek122979 for <hans.ullr...@loop.de>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id EA3E420682; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org Thu Jul 4 12:05:15 2024 Old-Return-Path: <hans.ullr...@loop.de> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on bendel.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, FOURLA,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Original-To: lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18E42067A for <lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.301 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FOURLA=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id CNGEsE8xgvQ4 for <lists-debian-u...@bendel.debian.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:03 +0000 (UTC) X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check from: .loop. - helo: .mail194c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7 Received: from mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (mail208c50.megamailservers.eu [91.136.10.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC67D20677 for <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: 01793666...@o2online.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1720094700; bh=5Um9/MplAQNd+svZJOunmBGElnorPOi9odLzGqxgObQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QLjumGn/60xFVhN9BUbajEg0uTOZxqi/Uz8jodz7E1EE2Hi7W3VtjJFW4LGmbJGnC Lt7Nym0B3iEmO+1/fxpnDfmt1lRnzu+Q65akTEd8eaEHbj8G7yo5OCpI4oVjRr7q9o pn0upeaUIrxnepbAwXeozeebIuTSx2zuaH0xvL30= Feedback-ID: hans.ullrich@lo Received: from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de [89.183.193.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 464C4rxR025870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:04:55 +0000 From: Hans <hans.ullr...@loop.de> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail! Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:04:53 +0200 Message-ID: <2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2> In-Reply-To: <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2> References: <3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2> <66868718.1030...@fastmail.fm> <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjgh fggfgtgejudeftdfjphegsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghnshcuoehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthhesl hhoohhprdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdvudekheefueevieelgefftdfhtedvlefgfefhieevveejud elhffhleethfeknecukfhppeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdekledrudekfedrudelfedruddtleenucevlhh ushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdhhvghlohepsg gvnhguvghlrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgdquggvsghirghnqdhus hgvrhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhpehlohhophdruggvsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpnhg spghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvg X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvf fufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohho phdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdethfeludejieeljeeugefgieekheeitdfggfehuedvvdfhjedute ekkedtvdenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrgh mpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthhgvuhhsvddrlhhotggrlhhnv ghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope dupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=1.59 X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 6.00]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[megamailservers.eu:s=maildub]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[];
