It seems complicated to understand what I can do and what I can't. So,my
idea is to prepare everything and then I will give my github repo (maybe
configured as a private repo) to a debian legal representative hoping that
he/she will tell me precisely where the project needs to be changed. But I
also think that before talking with them,I need that some experienced user
tries to pass his nvidia gpu installing "my" distro,to be sure that it
works. What do you think ?

Il giorno lun 17 ott 2022 alle ore 19:55 Andrew M.A. Cater <
amaca...@einval.com> ha scritto:

> [Title of the mail changed to reflect a new subject and topic following
> the suggestions in the FAQ and mailing list code of conduct.]
> Forwarded to the list as I sent this only to Mario by mistake.
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:29:45PM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote:
> > Hello to everyone.
> >
>
> Hi Mario,
>
> > I'm building my debian derivative distro not for business purposes,but to
> > be useful to someone. Maybe I will ask for some money as a donation,but
> I'm
> > not even sure. When I will have created the first stable version,I will
> put
> > it in my github with all the scripts that I have added inside the ISO
> > image.
>
> Money isn't really the issue here.
>
> Don't forget about the need to comply with licences on distribution of
> source and so on. Do track _exactly_ the changes you make from Debian -
> it will help you enormously.
>
> > I've read the guidelines and I've asked for clarifications to the
> > legal debian department. They seemed to be very open in relation with the
> > Debian logo usage,because it is open source,contrary to that of Ubuntu /
> > Canonical and so I've chosen Debian.
>
> See also the Debian trademark guidelines: https://www.debian.org/trademark
>
> > Since my goal is not to earn money,I
> > put the emphasis on the name of "my" distro,but at the same time I kept
> the
> > word Debian inside. It does not seem that this behavior is against some
> > rules. What do you think ?
>
> You do need to chat to the trademark folks - Debian is usually fairly open
> but it is important to get it right. Debian holds trademarks in the US, EU
> China and Japan as a minimum. https://www.debian.org/trademark#trademarks
>
> > I'm not using a complicated preseed file. I'm
> > using more configuration files ad hoc for the goal that I want to achieve
> > (to create a debian distro ready for passing thru every nvidia gpu which
> > work out of the box + various tools for achieving that goal and some
> > premade configurations to use different kind of virtualization tools).
>
> You need to be very careful indeed that you can distribute all the code you
> need to do this: you may also need to talk to Nvidia to work out how to get
> them to distribute firmware updates and so on to you.
>
> Likewise for the visualisation tools - many of these are proprietary and
> you'll
> need to be able to distribute these to your users and also be absolutely
> clear
> that distributing them together on the same media doesn't upset any of the
> individual vendors.
>
> > I
> > want to share the project with you,also. When I am satisfied,I will put
> the
> > first ISO on my github + all the config files added and I would like to
> > know what you think about it. To be honest,the Debian representative that
> > I'm talking with does not reply fast and he / she does not seem to ask a
> > decent amount of details.
>
> I think you need to check really clearly what the references on the Debian
> wiki give: I think you need to think carefully about how much you want to
> commit to this. If it didn't involve debian-live AND non-free code, I'd
> suggest that you talked closely to others about making this a Debian Pure
> Blend. As it is, I don't think that's an option.
>
> There's a lot to do as well as you possibly can before you can pass the
> results of your work to a single user, I'm afraid. Debian-legal folk will
> respond but you may need to be absolutely clear in your own mind exactly
> what you're doing and the extent to which your learning curve will
> get steeper to produce the solution. You may also want to talk to folk who
>
> Ot you're doing and the extent to which your learning curve will
> get steeper to produce the solution. You may also want to talk to folk who
> are already building and distributing distributions based on Debian-live.
>
> Distrowatch.com may help - LWN's distribtion's page is now almost a year
> out
> of date - but both of these may provide pointers to others who've done this
> before you.
>
> With every good wish, as ever,
>
> Andy Cater
>
>
> >
> > Il giorno lun 17 ott 2022 alle ore 13:47 Thomas Schmitt <
> scdbac...@gmx.net>
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > David Wright wrote:
> > > > they are no longer Debian logos. You
> > > > should give names to your edited files that indicate what they are:
> > > > /your/ images for /your/ derivative. Add them to the archive and
> > > > change the symlinks there.
> > >
> > > I found
> > >   https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines
> > > which Mario Marietto should check.
> > >
> > > Naming of files is not mentioned, afaics.
> > > But there is much emphasis on not using "Debian" in the name of the
> > > "business". This demand applies to various software packages and
> artwork,
> > > too:
> > >   https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines#De-.2FRe-branding
> > >
> > > I wonder whether a preseeded Debian Live ISO constitutes a derived
> distro
> > > and Mario Marietto's preseeding project qualifies as "business".
> > > The changes of which i know use an official Debian mechanism to shorten
> > > or hardcode the installation process. The Live personality is
> completely
> > > unchanged, afaik.
> > >
> > > So for now the only non-Debian thing is the title
> > >   "BridgeVmOS Debian Custom"
> > > in
> > >   https://ibb.co/GHHDQ3H
> > > It looks like a project name and thus could be regarded as "business".
> > >
> > > I wonder whether a title like
> > >   "Debian , preseeded by BridgeVmOS"
> > > would be ok.
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, before following the Guideline advise
> > >   "Consult the DebianProjectLeader meanwhile on a case-by-case basis"
> > > Mario Marietto should probably list the changes in his ISO towards the
> > > original ISO. I know of:
> > >   - Introducing a preseed file.
> > >   - Changing logo files in the initrd.
> > >   - (Packing up the ISO with xorrisofs options which are equivalent to
> > >      those currently used by Debian Live, as far as boot capabilities
> are
> > >      concerned. But Debian could move to other layouts for booting.)
> > >
> > > Such a list could then be the base of decisions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Have a nice day :)
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Mario.
>
>

-- 
Mario.

Reply via email to