Hi, David Wright wrote: > they are no longer Debian logos. You > should give names to your edited files that indicate what they are: > /your/ images for /your/ derivative. Add them to the archive and > change the symlinks there.
I found https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines which Mario Marietto should check. Naming of files is not mentioned, afaics. But there is much emphasis on not using "Debian" in the name of the "business". This demand applies to various software packages and artwork, too: https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines#De-.2FRe-branding I wonder whether a preseeded Debian Live ISO constitutes a derived distro and Mario Marietto's preseeding project qualifies as "business". The changes of which i know use an official Debian mechanism to shorten or hardcode the installation process. The Live personality is completely unchanged, afaik. So for now the only non-Debian thing is the title "BridgeVmOS Debian Custom" in https://ibb.co/GHHDQ3H It looks like a project name and thus could be regarded as "business". I wonder whether a title like "Debian , preseeded by BridgeVmOS" would be ok. Well, before following the Guideline advise "Consult the DebianProjectLeader meanwhile on a case-by-case basis" Mario Marietto should probably list the changes in his ISO towards the original ISO. I know of: - Introducing a preseed file. - Changing logo files in the initrd. - (Packing up the ISO with xorrisofs options which are equivalent to those currently used by Debian Live, as far as boot capabilities are concerned. But Debian could move to other layouts for booting.) Such a list could then be the base of decisions. Have a nice day :) Thomas
