On 2022-01-24 12:50, RP wrote: > On 1/24/22 09:33, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:55:25PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 12:44:52PM +0100, deloptes wrote: >>>> max wrote: >>>> >>>>> For comparison, RMS is publicly against singular "they", and Debian >>>>> developers voted not to censure him. >>>>> https://stallman.org/articles/genderless-pronouns.html Seems like a >>>>> double >>>>> standard, but whatever. >>>> If you engage in such discussion, you are ready to fail. There is no >>>> force >>>> in this universe to tell me not to use the pronouns he and she based on >>>> biological sex. >>>> The opposite is complete madness: I recommend listening to Jordan >>>> Peterson >>>> on this subject. >>>> I doubt RMS is authority in this field. He has opinion and this is >>>> it - he >>>> and not only he - no one has the authority to tell you or me how to >>>> speak. >>>> Language is to help us understand each other. Obviously someone does >>>> not >>>> want to admit to this basic rule and wants us to roll over into the >>>> Overtone window. It is absolutely unnecessary discussion. J. Peterson >>>> refuses to accept, I refuse and many others. It is perfectly OK. I >>>> have the >>>> same rights as you do. Period. >>>> >>> Can I please remind readers and posters: >>> >>> Communication on this list, on IRC and on other Debian media are bound >>> by the Debian mailing list code of conduct, the Debian IRC code of >>> conduct >>> and, above all, by the Debian Code of Conduct. >>> >>> https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct >>> https://www.debian.org/support#irc >>> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianIRCChannelGuidelines >>> https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct >>> >>> Action can and will be taken by listmasters if appropriate. >>> Please also report issues with conduct to the Community Team >>> >>> With thanks for your attention, >>> >>> Andrew Cater >>> [For and on behalf of the Debian Community Team] >>> >> Andrew, >> >> I am very concerned by your message and the signal it seems to be >> communicating. The links you provided do not seem to describe any sort >> of boundary or misbehavior which appears to be at issue in deloptes's >> message. The most egregious thing seems to be the continuation of an >> off-topic thread. There many contributors to that particular problem in >> this case in addition to delpotes. >> >> Could you perhaps describe precisely what offense was caused or what >> boundary was skirted in this instance? >> >> In the future, messages such as yours would appear less menacing and >> more constructive with this additional bit of information added. >> >> Regards, >> >> -Roberto >> > This whole thread has turned into a violation of the very first rule. > If you read Andrew's post, the first line says to "readers and > posters". This is for everyone. >
Copy of CoC : 1 - The mailing lists exist to foster the development and use of Debian. Non-constructive or off-topic messages, along with other abuses, are not welcome. 2 - Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the lists via packet radio, where swearing is illegal. 3 - Try not to flame; it is not polite. -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
