Hi, On 2022-01-23 19:37, max wrote: > January 22, 2022 1:52:16 PM CET "Marco Möller" > <ta...@debianlists.mobilxpress.net> wrote: > >> Without transparency the Debian project does not present itself as >> community driven, but as a closer circle of directing minds hiding the >> reasoning for their decisions. > > Indeed. In the US, one can demand to read the archived emails of public > officials (not just mailing lists) > None here are public officials, this is a private corporation even if it's of public utility.
And even public officials, you can get their mail but there will still be private information kept private. > Why does Debian need "private" mailing lists? What is it hiding from the > public? > If all would be public you'd be the first complaining and saying that it's so rude to talk about specific case, before a decision is made and share the information publicly. If there's a private sharing of information then haven't it ever passed thru your mind that it can be related to the need to keep confidential information ? For example, private and personal information regarding someone. The same as a jury decision is public, the deliberate are not. Oh, by the way, nice to meet you ! Seems odd that you are new to this mailing list and have some much interest in this debate. And so close on the timeline since someone else had left... -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
