On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:57:05AM -0300, Victor Hugo Muñoz wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
> 
> I'm having problems installing texlive in my PC. I'm using unstable
> here.
> 
> Everything started a couple of days ago, when I needed the package
> physics.sty. I had to install texlive-science. But dependences came
> in, and somehow I got a lot of configuration errors, and installation
> was not completed. I uninstalled all texlive related packages I could
> see, trying to make a fresh start. I think the problem is with
> texlive-base.
> 

It might be worth checking what packages you have installed. If you
can manage to, uninstall them (or use dpkg --purge to purge texlive-base
then retry.

> I have all its dependencies installed and updated (tex-common,
> texlive-binaries, etc.), and I'm attemting to install texlive-base
> only. I get this:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Performing actions...
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> (Reading database ... 217166 files and directories currently
> installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../texlive-base_2021.20210921-1_all.deb ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2021.20210921-1_all.deb
> (--unpack):
>  conffile name 'remove-on-upgrade /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config/config' is
>  not an absolute pathname
>  Errors were encountered while processing:
>   /var/cache/apt/archives/texlive-base_2021.20210921-1_all.deb
>   E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>   Press Return to continue, 'q' followed by Return to quit.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In case it helps, /etc/texmf only contains texmf.d and web2c
> 
> I don't know where to go from here, so any help will be appreciated.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Victor
> 

Also, as ever, my advice would be to use stable unless there is a
really compelling reason: unstable can change radically and
breakages happen.

All the very best, as ever,

Andy Cater

Reply via email to