On Du, 10 oct 21, 22:18:38, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > although i seem not to be worth to be targeted by our bounce assassin, > my mail provider and bendel.debian.org are at odds enough to produce > a real bounce message, which then causes a warning mail from > listmas...@lists.debian.org . > > I am trying to make sense out of the given bounce report > > https://lists.debian.org/bounces/79gUBBa56gHKY3wtHzNKdg
Yeah, got the same from listmaster, for the same exact message (I receive list mail via GMX too). > It is hard to distinguish the hearsay by bendel.debian.org from the > message parts which come from my provider's server mx00.emig.gmx.net. > Especially i wonder from where bendel takes the association to my > mail address (and which mentionings show its conclusions about my > address). > > Whatever, the reason for the bounce is that GMX accuses debian-user > of not meeting its requirements > https://www.gmx.net/mail/senderguidelines > All points there look like they are not volatile problems but rather > persistent ones. But listmas...@lists.debian.org wrote i had > > 1 bounce out of 68 mails in one day (1%, kick-score is 80%) > So why did the other 67 succeed ? My uneducated guess would be that GMX is applying additional undocumented criteria when deciding whether a message is spam or not, e.g. it might be that they didn't like the From: or something else entirely. In any case (as far as I understand) bouncing is wrong, because it can be abused by real spammers. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
