On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 19:39 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400 > > Dan Ritter <d...@randomstring.org> wrote: > > > > > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting hold of an address > > > > a logical part of a defense in depth strategy? > > > > > > Because it doesn't work. If it worked as well as, say, moving > > > your SSH port*, I would encourage it. It does not. > > > > Source? Is this your personal experience, or do you have some other > > basis for this? Cloudflare, for example, asserts that: > > > > "Cloudflare Email Address Obfuscation helps in spam prevention by > > hiding email addresses appearing in your pages from email harvesters > > and other bots, while remaining visible to your site visitors." > > Source: experience from being actively involved in the Internet > for 25 years, including time on anti-spam initiatives at BBN and > Akamai, various mail anti-abuse working groups (now > https://www.m3aawg.org/ which I'm not currently involved with > particularly) and running personal and corporate mail servers > for most of that time.
With experiences like that, you should be already well on your way to taking care of this: https://www.spamhaus.org/css/removal/record/2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe25:c4ae Your emails keep going into Spam/Bulk folders. :) Best wishes, -Jim P.
