On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:52:02, Ajith R wrote: > > Do I understand the style correctly now?
Mostly. Think of it as "conversational" style, with the reply following the portion of text it addresses. Other text should be removed, unless it provides useful context (would your message make sense if read by someone not familiar with the issue and without access to previous messages?). > BTW, a query about how the original message is quoted with '<'. Is it > done by hand or does any email clients do it automatically? Most email clients should do this automatically when you select "plain text" mode. HTML messages may look completely different at the receiving side, which is why they should be avoided. One can use other characters for emphasis, like *bold*, /italics/, _underline_. > Is it necessary that each line s marked with '<'? Or is it okay to > demarcate the quote at the start and end as I do? In my opinion the most important part is clearly distinguishing between quote and reply, as well as properly attributing quotes (who wrote what). Using '>' makes it easier for list recipients to read your message, e.g. my email client is configured to use different colours depending on the quote level. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
