Brad Rogers writes: > And as has been mentioned, people continue to use the > google/yahoo/whoever surveillance webmail systems. And let's face it, > they're not going to offer encryption that does not, at the very > least, have a backdoor in it.
Not cynical. Given that they must be able to scan the messages for business reasons[1] there is no way they can offer end-to-end encryption. [1] If the advertising agencies that offer those free Webmail services couldn't scan the messages for data to add to their databases how would they pay for them? They aren't operating as charities. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA
