On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:40:28 -0500 Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2019 08:25:54 Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 08:21:00AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > You can also help us by bouncing (as in mutt) spam to > > > > > report-lists...@lists.debian.org > > > > > > This _might_ be a good idea, if that address took forwards. > > > > Forwarding and bouncing are completely different operations. If you > > aren't using mutt/neomutt and don't have a literal bounce feature, > > then please just ignore this part. > > I am not using mutt. TDE version of kmail. And I'd point out that the > threat of a list unsubscribe is blamed on a "bounce". That specific > word. > > And as far as I know, fetchmail has no ability/facility to bounce a > message. Fetchmail-6.3.26 IIRC. Locally built from tarball. 'Bouncing' a message is typically done by a MUA (Kmail, in your case), not the MDA (fetchmail, in your case). Other MUAs besides mutt/neomutt do have 'bounce' options (although they may not always be called that), e.g., in Sylpheed, it's Message -> Redirect. Celejar
