On Thursday 21 February 2019 08:32:18 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 08:21:00AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 21 February 2019 03:59:37 [email protected] wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:45:50AM +0300, Reco wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > You can also help us by bouncing (as in mutt) spam to > > > > [email protected] > > > > This _might_ be a good idea, if that address took forwards. My > > incoming chain does not include the ability to do other than accept, > > then divert to /var/mail/virii or /dev/null. But my one attempt to > > forward to that address when debians poor spam/viri filters failed > > often enough to get my attention several years ago, resulted in its > > being bounced back to me > > There's a difference between 'Forward' and 'Bounce'. That e-mail is > for bounces. > > > Don't give me, or my current ISP a hard time because their spam > > filtering is far better ... using barracuda > > LOL. Did you mean *this* Barracuda - [1]? > The thing's a best possible example of how you *do not* filter spam > *ever*. > Maybe, but it works. > > I believe, or they'll put it in > > a spam folder, but thats rare, 4 to 10 msgs a day. > > Here (office, not this MTA) we have 1 (that's 'one') per week if we're > lucky (and on unlucky weeks it's exactly 0). And yes, it's Amavisd + > SpamAssassin + Greylistd. > > > Reco > > [1] http://www.dontbouncespam.org/
Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
