>
>
>
> In fact, I have many system in Debian 7.9, around the world, in amd64
> platform.
> On each, I have standalone repository deb_7.9 amd64.
> I would install another program that need i386 packages.
>
> The most efficient would be to create deb_7.11 amd64 and i386 repository
> on each platform (for migrate all servers, I agree), but it's too difficult
> because I have low connection with my plateform, and it's wild be difficult
> to copy all packages deb_7.11.
>
> So, I would like to send just needed packages for my program, in deb_7.9
> compatibility.
>
> ie : some packages are critical : libc6 or linux-hedears for exemple.
>
>
>
> Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 à 17:09, Roberto C. Sánchez <robe...@debian.org> a
> écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:49:10AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0000, BREBION Freddy wrote:
>> > > It's to take appropriate release package for Debian 7.9.
>> > >
>> > > I don't want mix package release between 7.9 and 7.11.
>> >
>> > Wheezy is Debian 7. 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, ..., 7.9, 7.10, and 7.11 are all
>> > "point releases" of wheezy. They are wheezy with security and
>> > other important bug fixes applied.
>> >
>> > Both 7.9 and 7.11 are obsolete, well beyond end of life, and even beyond
>> > Long Term Support (LTS). They are unsupported. There is no reason you
>> > should be seeking them out.
>> >
>> > That said, if you ARE running a 7.9 wheezy system for any reason, there
>> > is NO justifiable reason for you to KEEP it in that state. You can
>> > still obtain the patched packages to bring it up to 7.11. You don't
>> > even have to modify your sources.list. You just update & upgrade it
>> > normally.
>> >
>> > There is even LESS reason for you to be CREATING another wheezy 7.9
>> system
>> > at this point. What possible justification could you have for that?
>> > "To keep the other one from getting lonely"? If you require wheezy
>> > for some reason (which is conceivable), then you should simply install
>> > the most patched-up version of wheezy.
>> >
>>
>> While I understand where Greg is coming from, I disagree with it being
>> so absolute. There are reasons why someone might still legitimately
>> need to run wheezy, and even a prior point release from the latest.
>>
>> That said, more detail on the problem would make it possible to provide
>> more helpful advice.
>>
>> Freddy, can you provide a detailed explanation of what you are trying to
>> accomplish?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Roberto
>> --
>> Roberto C. Sánchez
>>
>>
