In fact, I have many system in Debian 7.9, around the world, in amd64 platform. On each, I have standalone repository deb_7.9 amd64. I would install another program that need i386 packages.
The most efficient would be to create deb_7.11 amd64 and i386 repository on each platform (for migrate all servers, I agree), but it's too difficult because I have low connection with my plateform, and it's wild be difficult to copy all packages deb_7.11. So, I would like to send just needed packages for my program, in deb_7.9 compatibility. ie : some packages are critical : libc6 or linux-hedears for exemple. Le mer. 23 janv. 2019 à 17:09, Roberto C. Sánchez <robe...@debian.org> a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:49:10AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:44:14PM +0000, BREBION Freddy wrote: > > > It's to take appropriate release package for Debian 7.9. > > > > > > I don't want mix package release between 7.9 and 7.11. > > > > Wheezy is Debian 7. 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, ..., 7.9, 7.10, and 7.11 are all > > "point releases" of wheezy. They are wheezy with security and > > other important bug fixes applied. > > > > Both 7.9 and 7.11 are obsolete, well beyond end of life, and even beyond > > Long Term Support (LTS). They are unsupported. There is no reason you > > should be seeking them out. > > > > That said, if you ARE running a 7.9 wheezy system for any reason, there > > is NO justifiable reason for you to KEEP it in that state. You can > > still obtain the patched packages to bring it up to 7.11. You don't > > even have to modify your sources.list. You just update & upgrade it > > normally. > > > > There is even LESS reason for you to be CREATING another wheezy 7.9 > system > > at this point. What possible justification could you have for that? > > "To keep the other one from getting lonely"? If you require wheezy > > for some reason (which is conceivable), then you should simply install > > the most patched-up version of wheezy. > > > > While I understand where Greg is coming from, I disagree with it being > so absolute. There are reasons why someone might still legitimately > need to run wheezy, and even a prior point release from the latest. > > That said, more detail on the problem would make it possible to provide > more helpful advice. > > Freddy, can you provide a detailed explanation of what you are trying to > accomplish? > > Regards, > > -Roberto > -- > Roberto C. Sánchez > >
