On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 07:55:55PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 7:40 PM <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 12:34:38PM -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
[...] > > OTOH, CCITT is lossless and JPEG lossy ;-) > > > > Not sure what you mean by "compresses much worse" here, but the CCITT > version is much smaller than the JPEG version. Maybe you meant that CCITT > looks worse after compression, which is weird when you also write that > CCITT is lossless! You're right -- but Thomas has the solution for this riddle (the CCITT throws away the grayscale information -- so, lossy too, after all :-) Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
